When Empathy Goes Both Ways

When Empathy Goes Both Ways

Rethinking Autism and Social Difficulty Through the “Double Empathy Problem”

For much of the past century, autism has been framed as a condition defined by social deficits - particularly a reduced ability to understand other people. This view shaped everything from clinical diagnosis to public perception.

But a growing body of research is challenging that assumption.

Instead of a one-sided deficit, scientists are now describing social difficulty in autism as a two-way problem of mutual misunderstanding. This idea is known as the double empathy problem, and it is reshaping how researchers - and increasingly clinicians - understand human connection.

A Shift in Perspective

The traditional model of autism suggested that autistic individuals struggle with empathy: reading emotions, interpreting social cues, and responding appropriately.

The double empathy framework turns that idea on its head.

It proposes that when two people have different ways of processing the world, communication can break down on both sides. In other words, the difficulty is not located entirely within the autistic person - it emerges in the interaction between people who think differently.

A useful analogy is language. When two people do not share a common language, neither is inherently deficient. The problem lies in the mismatch between their systems of communication.

What the Research Suggests

Recent studies have explored how information is shared within and between autistic and non-autistic groups.

One line of research uses variations of the “telephone game,” where a message is passed from person to person. Findings suggest that:

• Groups of autistic individuals can communicate with each other as effectively as non-autistic groups

• Communication breakdowns increase significantly when groups are mixed

This pattern indicates that the issue is not a lack of ability, but a lack of shared context and interpretation.

In other words, communication works best when people share similar expectations about how meaning is expressed and understood.

Beyond Deficit Models

The implications of this shift are significant.

Under the older model, responsibility for improving communication rested primarily on autistic individuals. Social skills training focused on helping them better interpret and mimic non-autistic behaviour.

The double empathy framework distributes that responsibility more evenly.

It suggests that:

• Non-autistic individuals may also struggle to understand autistic communication styles

• Social success depends on mutual adaptation, not one-sided correction

• Context and compatibility matter as much as individual ability

This does not eliminate the real challenges autistic people face, but it re-frames them as relational rather than purely individual.

Everyday Consequences

For autistic adults - especially those diagnosed later in life - this model often resonates with lived experience.

Many report that:

• They connect easily with some people but not others

• They feel misunderstood even when they are communicating clearly

• They expend significant energy trying to adapt to social expectations

The double empathy problem offers a way to interpret these experiences without assuming personal failure. It explains why communication may feel effortless in some contexts and exhausting in others.

A More Balanced Understanding

The emerging view does not deny that autistic individuals may need support. Rather, it emphasizes that support should not be based on the assumption of deficiency alone.

Instead, it encourages a more balanced approach:

• recognizing differences in communication styles

• creating environments where those differences are understood

• and reducing the expectation that one group must do all the adapting

The Takeaway

The double empathy problem re-frames a long-standing question.

Social difficulty in autism is not simply a matter of one person lacking empathy. It is often the result of two people failing to meet in the middle.

Understanding that distinction does not just change theory - it changes how people relate to one another in practice.

______________

REFERENCES

The Double Empathy Problem: A Derivation Chain Analysis and Cautionary Note - APA PsycNet

https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2024-87123-001.html 

Double empathy problem - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_empathy_problem 

Why everything you know about autism is wrong | Jac den Houting | TEDxMacquarieUniversity - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1AUdaH-EPM 

______________